Here’s my updated NCAA tournament field. I lifted BYU to a No. 1 seed and dropped Duke to a No. 2. More on that later. No. 1s Ohio State (BIG TEN) Pittsburgh (BIG EAST) Kansas (BIG 12) Brigham Young (MWC) No. 2s Duke (ACC) Texas San Diego State Notre Dame No. 3s Purdue Syracuse Louisville Wisconsin No. 4s Florida (SEC) North Carolina Georgetown Connecticut No. 5s St. John’s Arizona (PAC-10) Kentucky Vanderbilt No. 6s Villanova West Virginia Texas A&M Missouri No. 7s Temple Xavier (A 10) George Mason (CAA) UNLV No. 8s Cincinnati Washington Old Dominion UCLA No. 9s Utah State (WAC) Kansas State Illinois Marquette No. 10s Tennessee Georgia Virginia Tech Florida State No. 11s Michigan State Richmond Butler Alabama-Birmingham (CONFERENCE USA) No. 12s Cleveland State (HORIZON) St. Mary’s (WCC) Memphis Clemson Gonzaga Colorado No. 13s Missouri State (MVC) Oakland (SUMMIT) Belmont (ATLANTIC SUN) Princeton (IVY) No. 14s Kent

See the article here:
NCAA tournament 2011: Updated 68-team tournament field
- Share with Facebook and Twitter, Email or Print:
- Share
There’s nothing wrong with going nowhere but we should be going nowhere fast
Your homework between now and whenever I post again: Watch the criminally underrated, should-have-been-an-’80s-classic Streets of Fire . Three words: Teenaged Diane Lane! A pair of familiar and friendly faces welcomed me as I walked into Bogart’s, err, Chrebet’s, err, Bar Social June 23 for the NBA Draft party hosted by Mo Cassara and his staff. I shook hands, slapped shoulders and exchanged inside jokes with loyal readers HUSID80 and Jojogunne, both of whom had the same question: “Is the blog done?” I can’t blame them for asking—at the time, the only update I’d made since my April Fools’ Day post was a quick Q&A with Patrick Stevens previewing the NCAA men’s lacrosse tournament—and wondering if I’d gone the way of Beanie Babies, the Macarena and the idea people could get paid to write on the Internet. But even though I knew the blog wasn’t done (whoops—spoiler alert!), the question created an empty feeling in the pit of my stomach and guilt in my conscience. I already felt bad about neglecting the blog since the end of the season. I was disappointed with the inconsistency of the posts during the 2010-11 season, having had a job all year for the first time since I started Defiantly Dutch in August 2008, but figured I would finally try to use this off-season to get into a good routine and prepare myself for next year. I had some good ideas on chronicling (get it?) Charles Jenkins’ preparation for the draft along with the usual analysis and half-baked ideas I specialize in around here. Except—and you might not know this judging by my rather active Twitter feed, more on that shortly—I have been swamped at work. I mean, SWAMPED. My boss would be the first to admit she doesn’t know the first thing about basketball, but I’d swear she waited until the final buzzer sounded in UConn’s win over Butler in the national championship game to engage in some corporate reshuffling (translation: someone got fired) and entrust me with more responsibilities. That’s a good thing, because I get to contribute once again to the nitty gritty of adult life such as paying bills and buying groceries, but it has come at the price of the blog. I also have a regular freelance sportswriting gig that takes up a couple hours each day, so while it’s easy to plan to compile some DD posts come the weekend, by the time Friday afternoon arrives I just want to go out to dinner with my wife, sprawl out in the recliner and curse/cheer over the fate of my fantasy baseball team. Plus, as much as I’d like to, I usually can’t just whip up a blog post. A 500-word post turns into 1,000 words or more in no time flat (you know, like now). This is just something I spend a lot of time on, I can’t help that. Still, I feel bad that I haven’t followed in the footsteps of Mike Litos and Brian Mull and posted once or twice a week with the latest bits and bytes. I can’t say I feel bad about not following the day-to-day grind of recruiting, because I’ve never liked writing about recruiting and I never will and I’ll never try to bluff you and do a half-assed job of covering it. I admire those who do a good job with it and have established contacts on a challenging beat, and am glad to retweet the likes of Adam Zagoria of SNY and Zach Braziller of the New York Post who are the best at what they do. Still, while my general rule of thumb is I’ll write about a guy once he’s actually enrolled for the fall semester—an instinct proven correct by the Malik Nichols saga—I wish I could have been a bit better about posting about the signing of highly touted BCS transfers Jamal Coombs-McDaniel and Taran Buie, if only to fire back and take potshots at the handful of clueless Mason donks who don’t own a mirror and who are still under the delusion that so many of the players recruited by Jim Larranaga were of the high or even low character variety. Oh, wait, look at that, mission accomplished! (And speaking of Larranaga and his gloriously awesome departure to a retirement community in south Florida, I have a rant that is three-quarters finished, but I can’t decide if posting it would make me look like a stark raving psychopath or not. I mean, even a bigger stark raving psychopath than usual.) I hate that anyone sees my Twitter feed, where I rant about just about everything except Hofstra sports, and thinks I’ve ditched the blog. Twitter is a great way to blow off some steam during otherwise monotonous days and nights of work and I enjoy the interaction with people. But I haven’t forgotten that, despite all the occasionally R-rated ramblings about baseball and Scrubs and heaven only knows what else, the Twitter account name is still defiantlydutch. I’d also hate to think that anyone sees the blog inactivity and thinks of me as some unabashed fanboy (well, OK, that part is true) who thought it would be cool to write a blog and then quit when it got too hard and I found out that not everyone can be a writer. I’ve been doing this a long-ass time—more than half my life. If it was up to me, I’d still be getting paid for it, but if that was the case, I probably wouldn’t be doing Defiantly Dutch. And while I am disappointed every single day that I’m not covering baseball, and miss it more than just about anything, the truth is DD is a simpler and purer form of fun and that Cassara and, before him, Tom Pecora are far nicer to deal with than certain executives who work in one of Cassara’s old zip codes. Plus, with this post, I have officially presided over Defiantly Dutch longer than I went to Hofstra, which is pretty wild and something I take seriously. So, you know, this is a pretty good deal, even if it’s not optimal and even if I have to spend many more hours on real world grunt work and even if doing DD requires I develop the time management skills that have eluded me for 37 years and change. Ironically, in that it’s just pure coincidence, I wrote this as Bob Seger’s “Against The Wind” popped up on XM. My good friend Gary Moore already wrote about the struggles of running against the wind and writing a blog , so I won’t tread the same ground here except to say the line “deadlines and commitments, what to leave in, what to leave out” has never rang so true. I may have to leave in less Defiantly Dutch during the off-season, but the only thing that would drive me from here is a full-time paying job in sports journHAHAHAHAHAH I almost wrote that with a straight face. But seriously, I’m not going anywhere unless someone pays me to write about sports full-time. I’m sure the urgency of the start of the season (three months from Friday, but who’s counting?) will bring with it a sudden ability to find enough hours in the day to do everything, even if it means spending less time than I would like putting together posts. But until then, I’ll do my best to post here sporadically. There’s a lot to chew on, both looking back and looking ahead, and hopefully I can get to most of it. I’ve already had a nice sit-down with new assistant coach Patrick Sellers and I’ll have a story about him soon. And I spent two hours at Hofstra Friday making copies of Flying Dutchmen year-end statistics dating back to 1972-73, and it would be a crime against humanity if I failed to find several blog posts out of that treasure trove of geeky information. So while we may be going nowhere lately, don’t worry, we’re going nowhere fast. Hang on for the ride—whenever I start the Blue Beetle, that is. Email Jerry at defiantlydutch@yahoo.com or follow Defiantly Dutch at http://twitter.com/defiantlydutch .
- Share with Facebook and Twitter, Email or Print:
- Share
Read More
The recruiting reporter who wasn’t
On April 19, a recruiting analyst named Jonathon Paige wrote the first post on his new blog, Summer Hoop Scoop. That post came with a modest announcement : After a seven month hiatus and brief retirement, I am back. A lot of you followed me last summer on the website and twitter. I originally thought the yearly AAU circuit grind might be a bit much moving forward, but I just couldn’t hang up the kicks and notepad. With that, Paige soon got down to the business of finding and breaking recruiting information. He quickly amassed around 500 Twitter followers, and several mainstream college basketball reporters, assistant coaches and AAU personnel were among them. His site’s popularity grew. His news dispatches were cited in blog posts — including by some of the more popular team sites in the college hoops blogosphere — and his insights were debated and bandied on many a message board. The problem will all of this? Jonathon Paige doesn’t exist . He’s a fake, a fraud, the figment of an imagination. In a blog post on Summer Hoop Scoop yesterday, “Paige” — who signs the bottom of the post as “Troll,” an ode to Internet mischief-makers the world over — revealed his site, Twitter account, and everything else about the persona to be an elaborate ruse. But why? Why make up recruiting news? Why create a false identity? In his own words (seriously this time): When a recruiting “source” brings good news to a fan base, it is instantly credible and plenty are willing to defend the source with recollections of previous information provided that proved correct. When a recruiting source brings bad news, it is open season. “Never heard of this guy”… “probably some opposing fan base’s blogger” …. “I doubt he knows what he is talking about.” In short, fans believe what they want to believe. So, out of boredom and sincere interest in the relationship between the internet, recruiting services, and consumers, I created Jonathon Paige. The execution was easy enough. Troll “immediately” tweeted news from trusted recruiting sources, including ESPN’s own Dave Telep. He trolled message boards and “broke” any scant recruiting information floating around in the collective ether. He closely read the dispatches of recruiting analysts at summer tournaments and camps, then regurgitated that information in slightly different ways. He just flat made stuff up. And, when in doubt, he used language that seemed to appeal to fan bases’ specific sensibilities: When in doubt, use lots of language that appeals to specific fanbases (Example: Carolina fans love the words “family atmosphere” and Duke fans like to talk about “silent verbals” while Kentucky fans love to hear about John Calipari “going to work.”) In a remarkably short period of time, Mr. Troll’s hunch was proven correct. When he tweeted positive rumors about a recruit leaning toward a certain school, fans of that certain school were quick to adopt the information, while fans of competing schools angrily dismissed it. Blog posts cited his news with and without attribution. Message boards blew up. Some asked who he was; others defended him for getting things right in the past. If Jonathon Paige tweeted that a recruit was “leaning towards” school X, there would be multiple re-tweets and messageboard posts by fans of that school about the news. If another school in the race for the same recruit saw the tweet and it was brought up on a messageboard, the source and news would be summarily dismissed in short order… until something more positive came out a week later of course. And then came the coup de grace, one last “test” of the big joke’s ability: Breaking a big-time commitment rumor. Troll decided to see if a fictional Twitter account could convince people that elite 2012 recruit Kaleb Tarczewski was leaning toward North Carolina, even though his parents favored Kansas. Then, “Paige” called Tarczewski to UNC, even though the recruit was currently visiting another team’s campus. Some folks took the bait. Of course, this post is not written to chastise the media or bloggers or message board creatures or any of it. The Internet is a trust-based place, and it’s not like people are going to assume someone spending his months writing and blogging about recruiting is really a fake. I didn’t see Paige’s work until today, but could I have followed him? Sure. Nor do I believe this is necessarily an indictment of the media at large. Sure, there are elements in there: Where news filters exist, what sources can be trusted, who to believe and why — mass media continues to grapple with these fundamental challenges as the Internet changes the way we consume news and opinion. Troll’s experiment proves how difficult the business of recruiting news really is. Rumors are everywhere. Sources are, too. The ability to separate the real from the fake — the actual news versus the “my buddy heard so-and-so is coming to campus tomorrow, woooo!” — has never been more difficult. Throw in the fact that this news is about 16- and 17-year-old high schoolers unschooled in media management and prone to changing their minds, well, no wonder it’s so hard to figure out what’s really going on. And that was true even before Mr. Troll started making things up.
- Share with Facebook and Twitter, Email or Print:
- Share
Read More